Week Seven
“The history of organized education and training can be viewed as a long struggle to extend opportunities to more people and to devise means of helping those people learn better than through the events of everyday life” (Molenda, 2008, 5).
I earned my B.S. in Education in 2003 and
though I’ve not spent many years in the classroom since then I’ve been under
the education umbrella enough to see the pendulum swing right and left a few
times. There will always be a next best thing. A next best end all be all that
turns out to just be another swing of the pendulum. Always things to be learned
but there will never be a ‘one size fits most’ solution. Even the solutions
that leave lots of space for independence and not pigeonholing will never
fully fit the bill.
I am frustrated with the premise of Deepak
Prem Subramony’s research—that IT scholars neglect cultural diversity.
Although I cannot relate personally to the level of instructional technologists,
I can as a graphic designer. I worked for a nonprofit which supported early
childhood education. I handled our in-house graphic design. One of the
struggles I faced in every flyer, advertisement, promotion, etc was how to
visually represent the educators we served as well as the children those
educators served. Our scope was birth through age eight serving all over the
state of Indiana. My director wanted me to find stock imagery that included
kids spanning the age range, races, ethnicities, and abilities in one picture. The
more I searched the more discouraged I became until I realized it was a
pipedream. And that pipedream would have
been misrepresenting the population we served. From my vantage point, it was a
way for my director to feel like we were diverse even if we were not. At some
point, I threw in the towel and came up with other ways to ensure various groups
of kids were represented visually. I recognize my experience is not everyone’s
experience but I’m not sure at what point something legitimately becomes genuinely
diverse. And I’m not convinced diversity is the solution. Different people need
different things based on their own schema. There is no way that any solution
will ever be a perfect fit for everyone or even most because we all come to the
table with different things. I do think we are seeing more of a trend of poor
design as opposed to when the research was completed and reported. But I
believe the reasoning behind that is that anymore anyone with some basic
software thinks they are capable of doing the same quality of work as trained
professionals.
& M.P. Dirscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology
Reiser, R. A. (2007). A history of instructional design and technology. In R. A. Reiser, &
J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 17-
34). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Bradshaw, A. C. (2018). Reconsidering the instructional design and technology timeline from
the lens of social justice. TechTrends, 62, 336-344.
Subramony, D. P. (2004). Instructional technologists' inattention to issues of cultural diversity
among learners. Educational Technology, 19-24.
Cho, Y., Park, S., Jo, S. J., & Suh, S. (2013). The landscape of educational technology viewed
from the ETR&D journal. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5). 677-694.
Comments
Post a Comment